I don't remember where or when it was that I first heard this song--I suspect it was when I heard about the death of Kristy MacColl--but "Fairytale of New York" is now one of those songs I need to rehear every Xmas season. It's a reminder, as some of us need it, that there is always another Christmas others experience.
Tuesday, December 25, 2012
Monday, December 24, 2012
god is nancy lanza
this is a short essay that appeared a few days ago on one of the websites I visit daily--in fact, since I've started cutting much of the stress out of my life, the only political website I visit daily--and I thought it was very good. What fascinated me, however, is the number of vicious comments posted responding to it.I suppose I'm wrong in conceiving that, whatever guilt might ultimately be hers, we could join together in wishing Nancy Lanza a peaceful afterlife (whatever that might be), but the comments suggest I am not only wrong about that assumption, but I damn the children and adults killed by wishing it. Maybe it's only religious people--and by that I mean people who study religion and not people who call themselves religious, although the 2 groups are often joined--who can conceive of people who do evil things but are nonetheless forgiveable, especially on their deaths. I don't want to seem glib about that; I am myself unforgiving toward Ronald Reagan for the evil he perpetrated while president, so I'm not making myself a whitehat in this situation.
But as I said a week ago, God is Adam Lanza. God is also his mother Nancy. We still know painfully little about why Lanza committed the act he did and we haven't any further clue why his first victim was his mother. Equally, we don't know what she hoped to accomplish by teaching him how to fire automatic weapons or how avidly she followed the "prepper" subculture she joined. All we have are fantasies of her involvement and her guilt and those can't be substituted for unknowns. We do not only Lanza's victims, but Adam and Nancy Lanza themselves, and ultimately God and reality itself, a disservice by parceling out blame like porridge. All we know is that Adam Lanza killed his mother with her own guns and then killed other people and children and finally himself. We may never know anything more than that and to speculate about his mother's invovlement in his act is wrong. It's to try to tie a vivesected animal back together with a pretty bow and so pretend this is how the original product looked.
Labels:
adam lanza,
atonement,
children,
death,
ronald reagan,
school shootings,
theodicy,
theology
Wednesday, December 19, 2012
santa in the rain
There are things you encounter out here on the rim you might expect only to see elsewhere. One of them is a fellow silently standing along one of the overpasses to the interstate in a Santa costume with an American flag beside him. That seems only the sort of thing you'd see, say, in the midst of the hub.
But he's been there a couple years at least, and when I passed him--twice--on Sunday--the first time at 9 and then again as I returned at 1:30--I recognized him for the first time as a local example of a mashup of memes we'd grown accustomed to here. It was raining at that point, a mist steadily pouring out of the fog that surrounded us, and then it gradually tapered off to a dry patchy fog that seemed to coat everything with that odd texture of the chemical we used to spray on Xmas decorations to simulate snow.
Where I was going to and coming home from was the UU church I serve sometimes in the hub. I'd had a conversation with my wife, who is interning with a UCC church north of there, and we'd agreed that after the shooting on Friday, I ought to be with the people who look to me for spiritual help. It's one of the most important, non-aligned, quiet thing I think I do as a minister: simply to be present with people when something difficult happens.
They had scheduled a talk by a local organic farmer, Atina Diffley, whose book, Turn Here Sweet Corn, chronicles the 30 years she's been a part of a farm that began a century ago with the family of her partner. Her speech, and I don't think she'd planned it this way but how can you avoid drawing a connection with it, turned out to be a good example of the sort of hope and work for change we can take part in to make a difference in the face of overwhelming resistance.
Other people have noted the nearly irresistible force which the National Rifle Association has been--and when I was growing up, it was still only becoming that--and most of us take it as a given that attempts on the order of the Brady Center. I admit to bias: I want guns removed as much from our public places as possible. There are too many opportunities for wrongful use and accident to convince me otherwise. I don't want them completely removed from society--there's a place for weapons whose only purpose is to kill in our culture--but that place is neither in schools nor bars nor malls.
I'll be the 1st to admit I am scared shitless by guns. Pistols, shotguns, semiautomatic rifles: they all have the same effect on me. They make my skin itch. I understand they don't do that for others--my wife grew up in a gun-friendly culture and she's expressed her wish to inherit her dad's hunting rifle, the one he taught her to shoot with, when he dies and maybe display it. I eat venison supplied to me by the brothers-in-law and nephews and nieces whose joy is their annual hunt together. When I was a kid I had multiple BB guns and loved shooting targets (I won't say I got very good at it) and in high school I remember a gun-repair course that was one of the options in shop. You signed up, got your parents' permission, and brought your malfunctioning weapon to school to learn to fix it. That's probably led to a pretty good hobby or calling for some of those guys.
Neither do I begrudge the neighbor who collects guns or the cop who has to carry one to keep the peace. But I'll admit I don't feel safe around them. I don't think they'll turn them on me but they might. It's been known to happen. And unlike a lot of people who aren't in the military or involved in crime I've been shot at. I know already what my response is when faced with a person shooting at me. It is to piss my pants. I don't think 30 years have changed much about that reaction.
That digression aside, Atina's talk was mainly about engaged optimism, a term coming from British eco-philosopher Rob Hopkins, a transitional culture idea which is "a bottom-up approach to the creation of community resilience; the ability to withstand shocks at the local level. It [is] a solutions-focused and positive response.." to the problems communities face. It is, she suggested, this "sitting with" the problem and with the people who are involved in finding the solutions to it that mark the engagement as likelier to be positive rather than harmful to anyone concerned. There will be inconvenience--that can almost never be avoided or there wouldn't be a conflict about the solution in the first place--but there should not be harm.
I don't know how this might work in relation to the shootings in Newtown. We are only now learning that things we understood initially might not be quite right. That rather than being involved with the school, Lanza and his mother had cut their ties to it when he was younger. That his mother may have been involved in fringe "prepper" culture that many of us are only now learning about. What is most disturbing to us, in this culture of near-instant communication and information, is that we simply don't know, and may never really know, why he did what he did. This explains why so many crazy ideas about his motivation or why it "really happened" are floating around. Ignore them or, if you must, read them and pass on.
Stick to what is important. Noticing things--like Santa Claus in the rain, like what is happening in your community--and pay attention because you love one another.
But he's been there a couple years at least, and when I passed him--twice--on Sunday--the first time at 9 and then again as I returned at 1:30--I recognized him for the first time as a local example of a mashup of memes we'd grown accustomed to here. It was raining at that point, a mist steadily pouring out of the fog that surrounded us, and then it gradually tapered off to a dry patchy fog that seemed to coat everything with that odd texture of the chemical we used to spray on Xmas decorations to simulate snow.
Where I was going to and coming home from was the UU church I serve sometimes in the hub. I'd had a conversation with my wife, who is interning with a UCC church north of there, and we'd agreed that after the shooting on Friday, I ought to be with the people who look to me for spiritual help. It's one of the most important, non-aligned, quiet thing I think I do as a minister: simply to be present with people when something difficult happens.
They had scheduled a talk by a local organic farmer, Atina Diffley, whose book, Turn Here Sweet Corn, chronicles the 30 years she's been a part of a farm that began a century ago with the family of her partner. Her speech, and I don't think she'd planned it this way but how can you avoid drawing a connection with it, turned out to be a good example of the sort of hope and work for change we can take part in to make a difference in the face of overwhelming resistance.
Other people have noted the nearly irresistible force which the National Rifle Association has been--and when I was growing up, it was still only becoming that--and most of us take it as a given that attempts on the order of the Brady Center. I admit to bias: I want guns removed as much from our public places as possible. There are too many opportunities for wrongful use and accident to convince me otherwise. I don't want them completely removed from society--there's a place for weapons whose only purpose is to kill in our culture--but that place is neither in schools nor bars nor malls.
I'll be the 1st to admit I am scared shitless by guns. Pistols, shotguns, semiautomatic rifles: they all have the same effect on me. They make my skin itch. I understand they don't do that for others--my wife grew up in a gun-friendly culture and she's expressed her wish to inherit her dad's hunting rifle, the one he taught her to shoot with, when he dies and maybe display it. I eat venison supplied to me by the brothers-in-law and nephews and nieces whose joy is their annual hunt together. When I was a kid I had multiple BB guns and loved shooting targets (I won't say I got very good at it) and in high school I remember a gun-repair course that was one of the options in shop. You signed up, got your parents' permission, and brought your malfunctioning weapon to school to learn to fix it. That's probably led to a pretty good hobby or calling for some of those guys.
Neither do I begrudge the neighbor who collects guns or the cop who has to carry one to keep the peace. But I'll admit I don't feel safe around them. I don't think they'll turn them on me but they might. It's been known to happen. And unlike a lot of people who aren't in the military or involved in crime I've been shot at. I know already what my response is when faced with a person shooting at me. It is to piss my pants. I don't think 30 years have changed much about that reaction.
That digression aside, Atina's talk was mainly about engaged optimism, a term coming from British eco-philosopher Rob Hopkins, a transitional culture idea which is "a bottom-up approach to the creation of community resilience; the ability to withstand shocks at the local level. It [is] a solutions-focused and positive response.." to the problems communities face. It is, she suggested, this "sitting with" the problem and with the people who are involved in finding the solutions to it that mark the engagement as likelier to be positive rather than harmful to anyone concerned. There will be inconvenience--that can almost never be avoided or there wouldn't be a conflict about the solution in the first place--but there should not be harm.
I don't know how this might work in relation to the shootings in Newtown. We are only now learning that things we understood initially might not be quite right. That rather than being involved with the school, Lanza and his mother had cut their ties to it when he was younger. That his mother may have been involved in fringe "prepper" culture that many of us are only now learning about. What is most disturbing to us, in this culture of near-instant communication and information, is that we simply don't know, and may never really know, why he did what he did. This explains why so many crazy ideas about his motivation or why it "really happened" are floating around. Ignore them or, if you must, read them and pass on.
Stick to what is important. Noticing things--like Santa Claus in the rain, like what is happening in your community--and pay attention because you love one another.
Saturday, December 15, 2012
God isn't only the rose and not the thorn
I may read too many political and news blogs. The past 30 hours have been a blur to me of information, speculation, frustration, anger and righteousness. There is an appalling amount of what we don't know about the killing of children and adults in Newtown, CT.
Here is what little we do know: Around 9:30 a.m. Friday morning, a young man eventually identified as Adam Lanza of Newtown and "forced his way"--as yet police haven't explained what that means--into the elementary school. Apparently, he began immediately shooting indiscriminately with a high-powered rifle. According to the BBC, the shooting only took a few minutes and then stopped abruptly. Adam Lanza apparently took his own life after killing 27 people, more than 2/3 of them children, most of them girls, between the ages of 6 and 7. All the adults killed were women.
The most frustrating word in the above is "apparently," but it's a very apt word because we don't really know, in this age of 24/7, microdetailed news, exactly what has happened. We are more certain about what we don't know. Why did Adam Lanza carry his older brother's identification card, which is why he was originally misidentified? Why did he kill his mother, who may or may not have been a substitute teacher at the school, at their home before going to the school, which act, maddeningly, we are assuming? Why did he target the local elementary school and, once there, target small children? Why was he armed with both the rifle and 2 handguns, which he did not fire?
This is a particularly disturbing fact: Dr. Wayne Carver, the medical examiner who reported his findings to news organizations and who did autopsies on several of the children, said that at least 2 of them were shot at close range, and that many of them had been hit between 3 and 11 times.
At least among my Facebook friends, the primary emotion, after shock, has been despair. Why has something like this happened, they ask, and why is someone so obviously unhinged been allowed to have access to such murderous weapons? We also don't know the answers to either of these questions, although it's very possible, in relation to the second question, that Lanza may have never shown any sign of being mentally ill. The guns were his mother's.
Many of my friends are also insisting that this is the time to enact major gun control legislation, a perspective with which I'm in sympathy, but another friend who's a gunowner's rights advocate has pointed out that, short of making any gun purchase illegal, no control would have had an impact on this incident. So far as we know, Lanza's mother bought the weapons legally and may have had them locked away safely. I think he's right about that, too. We don't know how Lanza got access to them.
However, I am convinced now is the time to have the argument, fierce and angry and costly as it will be, we keep putting off about gun control. As someone else has pointed out, the perfect time for this conversation was before this incident happened; now is the second most perfect time. But we also need to have a theological conversation.
Many of my Facebook friends are seminarians and rabbis and ministers and chaplains. We link one another to articles and advice lists about how to talk about this with children and with each other. The despair we feel is a consequence of a very real sense we have that god is somehow absent from the events, although how that can be, while god is also somehow involved in all situations, fucks with our heads. Ecological theologian Sallie McFague has argued that religion has two primary criteria: "It has to make sense and it has to make a difference." It also has to take into account the painful, unnecessary deaths of children. This isn't that religion.
Theodicy has a long, storied history among monotheisms. But it isn't only Christians and Jews and Muslims who are asking "Where was God?" in Newtown. For an agnostic Unitarian like myself who sees everything related, there is no comfort to be had in the recognition that, whatever god is, god was there and involved. In my cosmology, god is the teachers who shielded their students with their bodies, and god is the children whose bodies were defiled. God is the school that Lanza forced himself into and god is the person who made the 911 call and the police and EMTs who responded to it. God is Dr. Wayne Carver and other M.E.s who have to examine the broken bodies of children.
But god is also the bullets that flew, 6 per second, from that powerful rifle. God is also the .223 Bushmaster assault weapon, a gun developed specifically for combat and has no other use, that Lanza used. God is also Adam Lanza.
This isn't very comforting, I'll admit. It's not a theology that says, "It's all for the best, they're with Jesus now," or "If only we'd done something different it would have never happened," both of which are a false comfort at best. But I don't think god is about comfort, at least not for most people. God is about living and dying, sometimes painfully. God is about reality and the real experiences people have which can involve having a gun pointed at them and being the one pointing the gun. If we accept that god is real in the world then we have to accept that god is everything real in the world. God isn't only the rose and not the thorn.
Here is what little we do know: Around 9:30 a.m. Friday morning, a young man eventually identified as Adam Lanza of Newtown and "forced his way"--as yet police haven't explained what that means--into the elementary school. Apparently, he began immediately shooting indiscriminately with a high-powered rifle. According to the BBC, the shooting only took a few minutes and then stopped abruptly. Adam Lanza apparently took his own life after killing 27 people, more than 2/3 of them children, most of them girls, between the ages of 6 and 7. All the adults killed were women.
The most frustrating word in the above is "apparently," but it's a very apt word because we don't really know, in this age of 24/7, microdetailed news, exactly what has happened. We are more certain about what we don't know. Why did Adam Lanza carry his older brother's identification card, which is why he was originally misidentified? Why did he kill his mother, who may or may not have been a substitute teacher at the school, at their home before going to the school, which act, maddeningly, we are assuming? Why did he target the local elementary school and, once there, target small children? Why was he armed with both the rifle and 2 handguns, which he did not fire?
This is a particularly disturbing fact: Dr. Wayne Carver, the medical examiner who reported his findings to news organizations and who did autopsies on several of the children, said that at least 2 of them were shot at close range, and that many of them had been hit between 3 and 11 times.
At least among my Facebook friends, the primary emotion, after shock, has been despair. Why has something like this happened, they ask, and why is someone so obviously unhinged been allowed to have access to such murderous weapons? We also don't know the answers to either of these questions, although it's very possible, in relation to the second question, that Lanza may have never shown any sign of being mentally ill. The guns were his mother's.
Many of my friends are also insisting that this is the time to enact major gun control legislation, a perspective with which I'm in sympathy, but another friend who's a gunowner's rights advocate has pointed out that, short of making any gun purchase illegal, no control would have had an impact on this incident. So far as we know, Lanza's mother bought the weapons legally and may have had them locked away safely. I think he's right about that, too. We don't know how Lanza got access to them.
However, I am convinced now is the time to have the argument, fierce and angry and costly as it will be, we keep putting off about gun control. As someone else has pointed out, the perfect time for this conversation was before this incident happened; now is the second most perfect time. But we also need to have a theological conversation.
Many of my Facebook friends are seminarians and rabbis and ministers and chaplains. We link one another to articles and advice lists about how to talk about this with children and with each other. The despair we feel is a consequence of a very real sense we have that god is somehow absent from the events, although how that can be, while god is also somehow involved in all situations, fucks with our heads. Ecological theologian Sallie McFague has argued that religion has two primary criteria: "It has to make sense and it has to make a difference." It also has to take into account the painful, unnecessary deaths of children. This isn't that religion.
Theodicy has a long, storied history among monotheisms. But it isn't only Christians and Jews and Muslims who are asking "Where was God?" in Newtown. For an agnostic Unitarian like myself who sees everything related, there is no comfort to be had in the recognition that, whatever god is, god was there and involved. In my cosmology, god is the teachers who shielded their students with their bodies, and god is the children whose bodies were defiled. God is the school that Lanza forced himself into and god is the person who made the 911 call and the police and EMTs who responded to it. God is Dr. Wayne Carver and other M.E.s who have to examine the broken bodies of children.
But god is also the bullets that flew, 6 per second, from that powerful rifle. God is also the .223 Bushmaster assault weapon, a gun developed specifically for combat and has no other use, that Lanza used. God is also Adam Lanza.
This isn't very comforting, I'll admit. It's not a theology that says, "It's all for the best, they're with Jesus now," or "If only we'd done something different it would have never happened," both of which are a false comfort at best. But I don't think god is about comfort, at least not for most people. God is about living and dying, sometimes painfully. God is about reality and the real experiences people have which can involve having a gun pointed at them and being the one pointing the gun. If we accept that god is real in the world then we have to accept that god is everything real in the world. God isn't only the rose and not the thorn.
Sunday, November 25, 2012
thanksgiving wedding homily
Without a doubt my favorite ministerial activity is marrying people. For me it is more than simply the ritual and the single day of joining them together; I delight in the months of planning, the meetings and getting to know the couple, their histories together and apart, their concerns and hopes. There is little more exciting than sitting together with them over coffee and talking about why they've decided to make their union an official and legal one, why they choose one another. Then the sitting down part, writing the homily. Below is my most recent, written for a couple whose male half I've known since teenagerhood. Each of them has had issues and difficulties they've had to process and, after confronting their problems alone, have realized another person will meet them with them. I've often said it's an honor to be with someone as she dies; it's equally an honor to be with people as they come together.
Marriage Homily
There
is a symmetry to marrying a day before Thanksgiving. Doing so ensures that in the future you will
never be able to celebrate the one without thinking about the other. Both of
you have celebrated other thanksgivings in the past with other families—your
families of origin, families of friends, and for both of you, families composed
of other partners. But from today
forward you will celebrate this time of year with a new family composed of the
members you are responsible for having brought together. The two of you plus your children you bring to this union.
How
similar this is to the legend of the First American Thanksgiving. We’re all familiar through repetition of it
in school and in popular culture. How
the Wampanoag tribe, neighbors of the early settlers, took pity on their
starving neighbors and showed them better and more efficient crop-planting
procedures, and how the grateful Pilgrims repaid that kindness with a huge
shared feast. Whether or not this is
accurate is beside the point: it makes
for a good story. Sometimes a good story
is better than history.
In
the future you will tell other people similar good stories. The story of visiting the bar with friends where the other was DJing and realizing the two of you were the only
sober people in the place. The story of
your little week away from the world in Amsterdam where you decided to betroth
to one another but not to tell anyone else.
You may have had some indication as you grew closer that your growing
relationship would become this melding of two separate tribes, a sort of
contemporary Brady Bunch.
But
like the coming together of the English and Dutch Pilgrims and the Native
Wampanoag, you will have periods of discord and fights. As all tribes come together there are problems. You are two individuals who have made your
own ways in the world, raised children on your own, lived your own lives. You are too strong to submerge all your
choices and opinions in favor of the other.
As you’ve put it, you don’t feel a need to front for each other. You recognize your own selfishness for your
time together. Sometimes that
selfishness will require you to have some of that time apart. That’s as it should be. You’re like two trains that have come
cross-country separately, each with your own complement of baggage cars, and
now are joining to make the rest of the trip together. Such a union is expected to have creaks and
groans and periods when nothing fits.
But
if there is one thing I would wish for you it would be that you always remember
it’s better to be happy than to be right. In the future I hope you give thanks
for the blessings of relationship and love.
Human beings long to be in community, yearn for companionship, but
keeping it is never easy. In the years
ahead there will be times of conflict and sometimes of trial. That is as it should be. There will also be times of joy and
exultation. That is also as it should
be. I hope for you that the joys will
outnumber the trials. The two of you are
become a union. The six of you are
become a union. Keep your union
strong.
Labels:
beloved community,
home,
joni mitchell,
weddings,
wisconsin
Friday, November 23, 2012
teach naked

I've no clue where this quote came from--I've done a cursory background search and, aside from this quote, there seems no information on Alexandra K. Trenfor otherwise--but that doesn't diminish from the truth of what she, or someone who attributes it to her, said.
Similarly, I'm rereading Parker Palmer's Healing the Heart of Democracy, and came across the following wisdom: "No educational task is more important than helping students reflect on realities larger than their own egos." This was always, although I never articulated it the way Palmer has, the impetus behind my teaching and I hope that came through to most of my students. I'm learning to translate this now to everyday life; that's harder and less often rewarded, I've found, but no less rewarding.
Labels:
academia,
alexandra trenfor,
counterculture,
education,
ethics,
morality,
parker palmer,
teaching
Saturday, November 10, 2012
it is time for us to be prophets
I am an unabashed liberal. I have been reading in a number of places and hearing from a number of people that now, on the other side of political victory, it is time to lead our nation to heal, to draw us back together into a single community.
It is not.
No, it is time to press our advantage for all it is worth and remind our opponents--by which I don't mean Romney-supporters but supporters of hurtful policies and beliefs who may have supported Romney or not but certainly supported the losing side--that they are finally, undeniably, irrecoverably wrong.
We should model ourselves on the prophets of the Older Testament who did not suggest that the way to save the Hebrew people was for everyone to get over their differences and see one another's point of view. Deborah reminds the general Barak(!) that victory comes to the one who takes presses a situation's advantage. Amos directs his angry words at the "fat cows" who "oppress the poor and crush the needy." Jeremiah railed against the false prophets and their followers, "They were not even ashamed at all; They did not even know how to blush...I will pour out their own wickedness on them."
It is time for us to be prophets, to tell them that they are wrong. Those who believe Fox News tells them the truth; they are wrong. Those who are convinced the president was born in a foreign country and is an illegitimate leader; they are wrong. Those who behave as if "God helps he who helps himself" is a Biblical teaching; they are wrong. Those who are certain that a ring and pledge of purity will somehow keep teen pregnancy at bay; they are wrong. Those who think that their casual racism is somehow protected self-expression; they are wrong. Those who feel themselves "taxed enough already"; they are wrong. It is time to stop being humble about our views, as if they are somehow less-realistic, less-rigorous, less-accepted by the American people.
We won and we won big. We saw more clearly where the country is headed and what people are concerned with. We must not be embarrassed by our having been right. We are the ones with vision and we are the ones who have been proved right. We may not be right in the future--in fact, about some things we are as certain to be wrong in the future as we are right now. But we are right today. Own that.
It is not.
No, it is time to press our advantage for all it is worth and remind our opponents--by which I don't mean Romney-supporters but supporters of hurtful policies and beliefs who may have supported Romney or not but certainly supported the losing side--that they are finally, undeniably, irrecoverably wrong.
We should model ourselves on the prophets of the Older Testament who did not suggest that the way to save the Hebrew people was for everyone to get over their differences and see one another's point of view. Deborah reminds the general Barak(!) that victory comes to the one who takes presses a situation's advantage. Amos directs his angry words at the "fat cows" who "oppress the poor and crush the needy." Jeremiah railed against the false prophets and their followers, "They were not even ashamed at all; They did not even know how to blush...I will pour out their own wickedness on them."
It is time for us to be prophets, to tell them that they are wrong. Those who believe Fox News tells them the truth; they are wrong. Those who are convinced the president was born in a foreign country and is an illegitimate leader; they are wrong. Those who behave as if "God helps he who helps himself" is a Biblical teaching; they are wrong. Those who are certain that a ring and pledge of purity will somehow keep teen pregnancy at bay; they are wrong. Those who think that their casual racism is somehow protected self-expression; they are wrong. Those who feel themselves "taxed enough already"; they are wrong. It is time to stop being humble about our views, as if they are somehow less-realistic, less-rigorous, less-accepted by the American people.
We won and we won big. We saw more clearly where the country is headed and what people are concerned with. We must not be embarrassed by our having been right. We are the ones with vision and we are the ones who have been proved right. We may not be right in the future--in fact, about some things we are as certain to be wrong in the future as we are right now. But we are right today. Own that.
Labels:
bible,
morality,
obama,
polls,
poverty,
religious conservatives,
responsibility,
sex
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


