“Lionesses’ Teeth”
Homily presented to the
Dakota UU Church of
Burnsville, MN,
Normally
during my celebration of Flower Communion my contribution is a freshly-plucked
dandelion. Taraxacum officinale. I use
it because we all recognize it in its omnipresence, as indestructible as
love.
We have yet
to see them this year because of the incredibly late winter we’ve
experienced—only a week ago my wife and I were stranded because our driveway
had sixteen inches of snow unceremoniously dumped on it by whatever malevolent
snow-god or whatever sleeping spring-god there might be —but I guarantee you
they will be coming and they will be everywhere. The dandelion is the cockroach of flora. They existed long before our species rose up
from the proverbial swamp and after we return to the dust they will continue to
be here.
The name “dandelion,” which I’d
always assumed referred to the yellow mane of the flower and its seeming
vanity, actually comes from the French dents
de lion, “teeth of the lion,” and refers instead to the deeply serrated
rosette of leaves that poke up from billions of lawns, in abandoned lots,
between the cracks in concrete, in the clefts of mountain crags and
skyscrapers, and sometimes tufting out of the useless chimneys of houses where
no hearths have burned in decades. They
are perennial and rely on bees and flies to pollinate, and when they’re ready,
the wind carries their seeds on tiny parachutes to new places. Sometimes they fly as much as several hundred
meters. They do not need us at all.
Dandelions
are often used as a medicine, usually involved with blood, the liver, and gall
bladder. Its juices aids detoxification
and bile flow, promotes lactation and the immune system, and helps reduce
eczema and cough and asthma. The root
can be dried and ground up and added to coffee, like its close relative
chicory, and the leaves are often delicious in salads (although I’ll admit I
have to add a lot of butter to make them palatable). And most of us are of an age when we have had
dandelion wine.
Had Jesus
been born in, say, Kansas
rather than in the Middle East , the Sermon on
the Mount might have included the following:
Consider the [dandelions,] how they
grow; they neither toil nor spin; yet I tell you, even Solomon in all his glory
was not arrayed like one of these.
Because, try
as I might to eradicate it, the dandelion remains as much a part of my life as
a part of my landscape. I cannot escape
its existence. I mow and weed and even
spray the lawns, and still they come back up.
That is their unique power.
A story now, a contemporary one,
about motherhood that serves to relate how people are like dandelions. Our relationships with our mothers, with
either parent actually, can be pleasant and problematic at best. I had what I think was a pretty good
relationship with my late mother and with my dad, secure at all times in the
knowledge that, no matter what, they loved me and wanted nothing but the best
for me. Those among us who are mothers
or parents likely have that same assurance that they, too, love their children
no matter what.
This week
we saw the end of a news story that adds a different, more complex concept to
this topic. I refer of course to the
story of the three girls, now three women, in Cleveland, the first of them
abducted nearly eleven years ago, the last of them nearly nine years ago, all
three found alive and relatively healthy in the home of their presumed kidnapper.
We can have
only the barest inkling what Melissa Knight, Amanda Barry, and Gina DeJesus
experienced over the past decade. We
should be thankful for that. Worse
perhaps, we are even less capable of imagining what the six year old daughter
of Amanda Barry and her captor, whose name has yet to be released, has
experienced. If she is fortunate she herself
will retain little memory of what her life to now has been.
[Note: In illustrating this post I purposely chose a photo in which her daughter's face is blurred. There are many images available where it is not but I think she should be allowed as much privacy as possible.]
There are
so many things to be said about this situation, about the Castro Brothers’
activities and what they hoped to accomplish [update]; about the women’s years in
captivity and in physical, emotional and sexual abuse; about how this situation
happened in a neighborhood of a major American city and not in some Hills Have Eyes outback; about the unwillingnessof police, despite what are supposed to have been multiple reports by
neighbors, to investigate beyond the front door of Castro’s home; and most
especially, there are things yet to say about Charles Ramsay and his
willingness to expose his own past—because in this brave new networked world
there are no past sins that can’t be found—in order to do the right thing.
But what
I’d like to talk about is Amanda Berry and her daughter. And how what little we know might suggest
about motherhood and resilience. The
story as it’s come to us is that a week ago today Ariel Castro left his home to
eat at a local McDonald’s. If he did
this on a regular basis we don’t know, and if he didn’t why he chose this day
to do it, no one apparently knows, but when he did Amanda Berry took the
opportunity to scream as near the door as she could until someone
responded. Charles Ramsay did, and it’s
a testament to his heroism that this man, who partied with Castro, eaten BBQ
with him, played music with him, didn’t say “It’s a domestic matter” and turn
around, and after listening to her story that she was being held against her
will kicked the bottom panel out of the door.
Berry, carrying her child, squeezed through the broken panel, hugged
Ramsay, begged him to take her to his house to use his phone, and then called
police.
Some of us
might routinely play a mental game with ourselves in which, if we were caught
in a disaster and could save only one thing, what would it be. To make it more interesting we often presume
that there are no people or animals involved, to make it a specifically
material question. What thing would we
save? Amanda Berry did not have the
luxury of pretending or of there being no person involved. The material object she left with was her
daughter.
To put this decision in perspective, consider
what myriad complications must have been involved over the past six years. Berry was just under seventeen when she was
abducted. After years of sex with her
abductor and probably his brothers—we presume the middle brother, Ariel, is the
abductor because it’s his house the women were found in but the abductor could
be any of the brothers[see update above] or, worse yet, someone we’re not even aware of—she is
pregnant at twenty and delivers a daughter into the dark, airless, sunless
existence she’s come to figure will be her future. We don’t know if she wanted this girl or
feared for her existence, born into the same situation she’d been held captive
in, and it’s likely it was a combination of both sensations and any number of
others. She may have wanted to abort the
fetus, although we have heard suggestions from one of the the other women that Castrobeat her when she was pregnant to spontaneously miscarry. So what we are left to
guess at is that either Amanda fought vigorously to have this child or that
Ariel, who DNA tests have proved to be the father, had a change of heart over
this pregnancy and decided to allow it to be brought to term.
This girl,
born into a situation her mother was abducted into, and raised only in the
company of the other two abducted women and the Castro brothers—what can be
going through her head? She is six years
old, she has known only these six people in her life. Two of them are her parents. One of them carried her out of her world into
the unknown, into what she can’t possibly know.
So while we can’t know what Michelle, Gina or Amanda has gone through we
can, with some certainty, know what Amanda’s daughter is experiencing now: Absolute, unqualified, quaking fear.
It seems to me, as an outsider looking in on
parenthood, that this is one extreme part of what it means to be a mother: To deliver your child into great uncertainty
and, when the time comes, to help her escape into greater uncertainty. But that is what you must do.
It’s well
known that among lions it’s the female, the lioness, who hunts and who is
really the fiercer of the species so it may be that the distinctive feature about
dandelions—their serrated leaves, the dents
de lion—may more accurately be termed the dents de lioness. Perhaps
the natural reaction as mothers, as parents, even as proponents of religious
liberalism, is to emulate the dandelion—stubbornly resistive to any attempt to
root us out, to burn us out, and even to the natural tendency of entropy to
crumble us from within.
Our message,
the message of religious liberalism, the message of people who see great
complexity to parenthood—that it is better to be alive than to be dead, that to
treat anyone as less than the glorious being that he or she is is itself an
evil, that children and the people we’re responsible for need safe food and
safe water and safe places to live, and that these are not starry-eyed ideals
but necessities—must be heard. We must
endure for these messages to be heard.
We must become ubiquitous and obnoxious, unwilling to be pressed from
our perch. We must be willing to grow
quietly beside the more beautiful and cozened strawberry and rose and lily so
to suck up some of their excess nutrient and water until we can elbow those
more popular petals aside to take the place we’ve earned. To endure as a faith and as a people we need
to be as tough, as resilient, and as uncompromising as the common
dandelion.
No comments:
Post a Comment